British Empire Codexery

Damascus Protocol

Document outlining Arab independence demands in exchange for revolt.

On 23 May 1915, during his second visit to Damascus, Faisal bin Hussein received a document from the Arab secret societies al-Fatat and al-'Ahd. This document, later known as the Damascus Protocol, laid out the conditions under which the societies would support a revolt by Faisal's father, Hussein bin Ali, against the Ottoman Empire. The key demand was that these terms be presented to the British. The protocol defined the borders of a future independent Arab state, covering all Ottoman lands in Western Asia south of the 37th parallel north. This territorial definition later shaped the Arab side of the Hussein–McMahon Correspondence.

Date
23 May 1915
Recipient
Faisal bin Hussein
Originators
al-Fatat and al-'Ahd
First English translation
George Antonius in 1938
Key demand
Recognition by Great Britain of Arab independence within defined frontiers
Territorial scope
Ottoman Western Asia south of the 37th parallel north

Lore & Background

The Damascus Protocol was presented to Faisal bin Hussein on 23 May 1915 during his second visit to Damascus, while on a mission to consult Turkish officials in Constantinople. The secret societies al-Fatat and al-'Ahd declared they would support Faisal's father Hussein bin Ali's revolt against the Ottoman Empire if the demands in the protocol were submitted to the British. The text was first translated into English by George Antonius in 1938, based on a copy given to him by Faisal.

Reader's Guide

The Damascus Protocol is significant as it crystallized the territorial and political aspirations of Arab nationalists during World War I. Its demands—for British recognition of an independent Arab state stretching from the 37th parallel north to the Indian Ocean, and from Persia to the Mediterranean—formed the basis of the Arab side of the Hussein–McMahon Correspondence. The protocol's frontiers later became a point of contention in post-war negotiations, as British commitments to other parties (such as the Sykes-Picot Agreement) conflicted with the boundaries defined in the document. Its legacy lies in its role as a foundational text for Arab nationalist claims to self-determination in the Levant and Arabian Peninsula.

Did You Know?

More in British Empire 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →